See www.antiplagiarism2014blog2.wordpress.com for other medical Journals

Advertisements

Copied/paraphrased texts using PlagiarismFinder.de

PlagiarismFinder.de
Gewichtet // Ponderata (procente text copiat/parafrazat inadecvat)
[0-1%)        >>  Es handelt sich nicht um ein Plagiat // Cu certitudine nu este un plagiat
[1-5%)        >>  Es handelt sich sehr wahrscheinlich nicht um ein Plagiat // F. probabil nu este un plagiat
[5-10%)      >>  Es handelt sich wahrscheinlich nicht um ein Plagiat // Probabil nu este un plagiat
[10-25%)    >>  Es handelt sich wahrscheinlich um ein Plagiat // Probabil este un plagiat
[25-50%)   >>  Es handelt sich sicher um ein Plagiat // Foarte probabil este un plagiat
[50-100%] >>  Es handelt sich um ein Plagiat // Cu certitudine este un plagiat

Galenus – Dr. Ruxandra Dumitrescu, editor-in-chief, Dr. Mihai Gherghiceanu, scientific coordinator

Galenus image unmodified jpg

  1. Paltineanu-Revnic F & C2015 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  2. Paltineanu-Revnic F & C2014 – QUASIFULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  3. Paltineanu-Revnic C2014 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  4. Paltineanu-Revnic F & C2014FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  5. Paltineanu-Revnic F2014FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  6. Paltineanu-Revnic F & C2014FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  7. Paltineanu-Revnic F2013FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Sources 
  8. Paltineanu-Revnic F2013 FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  9. Paltineanu-Dinu-Revnic F – FULL PLAGIARISM:  Article   Source
  10. Revnic F & C-Pena-Prada S & G et al2014 – FULL PLAGIARISM:  Article   Source
  11. Revnic F & C-Pena-Prada S & G et al2015FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Sources
  12. Revnic F & C-Pena-Prada S & G et al2014 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  13. Revnic F & C-Prada S & G-Pena et al2013 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  14. Revnic F & C-Prada G & S-Pena et al2013FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  15. Revnic F & C-Pena-Prada S & G et al2015 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Sources
  16. Revnic C & F-Pena-Prada S & G et al2015FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  17. Revnic C & F-Pena-Prada S & G et al2014 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  18. Revnic C & F-Pena-Prada S & G et al2013FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Sources
  19. Revnic C-Pena-Prada S & G et al2013 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  20. Revnic C-Prada G & S-Dinu-Pena et al2013 – FULL PLAGIARISM: Article   Source
  21. Revnic C & F-Prada G & S-Pena et al2013 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  22. Dinu-Revnic C2015FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Sources
  23. Dinu Gabriel Ovidiu2015 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  24. Dinu Gabriel Ovidiu2016 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  25. Ionita-Revnic F2013 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  26. Ionita Emil2016FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  27. Ionita Emil2014FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  28. Olaru-Pena2013COPY-PASTE Score 53%:   Article   Sources
  29. REMOVED: Olaru-Pena2010QUASIFULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Sources
  30. Opris Simona2015 – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Sources
  31. Revnic F & C-Pena-Prada S & G et al FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  32. Revnic F & C-Dinu-Prada S & G et al – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  33. Revnic C & F-Prada G & S-Dinu et al – FULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source
  34. Ionita EmilFULL PLAGIARISM:   Article   Source

I. Acta Medica Marisiensis – Prof. Copotoiu Sanda

1. SORLEA S-COPOTOIU C2011 – PLAGIARISM has been PROVED by National Ethics Council (NEC)
Article   Source   Ethics Council Report   Wiggers claim   PhD papers – old list   PhD papers – new list    

2. IVĂNESCU A-BRÂNZANIUC K2011 – PLAGIARISM has been PROVED by NEC
Article   Sources   NEC Report   Rammal claim   PhD papers

3. DUȚU M-AZAMFIREI L2011 PLAGIARISM has been PROVED by National Ethics Council (NEC)
Article   Sources   NEC Report   
International Assessment of Article: http://integru.org/ro/reviews/dutu-azamfirei-2011   Stachon claim Google Academic

4. HALMACIU I-BRINZANIUC K2013 FULL SELFPLAGIARISM in the same Journal
 Article   Sources   PhD papers   Phd thesis-defending   Brinzaniuc-project manager

5. DOBREANU DAN (ExViceRECTOR), Head of Depts (Physiol & Cardiol) – Plag Text 90%
Article     Sources

6. TĂNASE-AZAMFIREI-BRÂNZANIUC-COPOTOIU2012 Plag Text 50%, Hiddeen sources
Article   Sources   Text Plagiarism – confirmation   Google Academic

7.  SOLOMON-AZAMFIREI-COPOTOIU R, COPOTOIU S – Suspicion of DATA Falsification
Article   Sources   PhD papers

8. PRETORIAN-exViceRector BORDA ANGELA2011Plag Text 54% 
Article
     Sources      PhD papers

9. DOBRU D2012 – DIRECTOR of Doctoral School of UMPh Tg. MuresPlag text 95%
Article     Source

10. DOBRU DANIELA2011 (Head of Gastroenterol Dept)Plag Text 81%
Article     Sources

11. PASCARENCO O-DOBRU D2011 Plag Text 80%
Article     Sources     Dept represent papers     Prof Dobru – papers 

12. OPRIS MIHAELA2011 (ExViceDean) – Plag Text 69%
Article     Sources     Dept Represent Papers

13. SZILVESTER MÓNIKA Sf. Gheorghe County Hosp – Plag Text 66%; Hidden text sources
Article     Sources

14. ECHIM I-exCancelor NIREȘTEAN A2011Plag Text 54%
Article     Sources

15. COJOCARU MARIANA2010 TV Astrologer – Plag Text 70%
Article     Sources

16. MATEOIU CLAUDIA2010 – Plag text 82%
Article     Sources

17. CHIFU MD-SIN A – Plag Text 60%
Article     Source

18. COMAN SIMONA2010 – Plag Text 90%
Article     Sources     PhD papers 

19. JEDERÁN ÉVA2010 – Plag Text 70% 
Article     Sources     PhD papers

20. BANESCU C-DOBREANU M2011 Plag Text 58%; Suspicion of Data fabrication
Article   Sources   Dept represent papers   Banescu preferment

======================================================================

SYNTHESES

31 ARTICLES (suspected of plagiarism) published in Revista Romana de Medicina de Laborator; see address https://antiplagiarism2014blog.wordpress.com/2016/10/08/dobreanu-m-editor-in-chief-of-rrml-head-of-dept/ (editor-in-chief DOBREANU MINODORA from UMPh Tg. Mures, Romania)

9 ARTICLES (suspected of plagiarism) published in some Journals; see address https://antiplagiarism2014blog.wordpress.com/2016/10/06/de-la-parafrazare-la-plagiat-curs/(author or coauthor BANESCU CLAUDIA from UMPh Tg. Mures)

7 ARTICLES proved or suspected of plagiarism) published in some Journals; see address https://antiplagiarism2014blog.wordpress.com/2016/10/05/azamfirei/ (author or coauthor AZAMFIREI LEONARD from UMPh Tg. Mures)

7 ARTICLES (proved or suspected of plagiarism) published in some Journals; see address https://antiplagiarism2014blog.wordpress.com/2016/10/03/branzaniuc-k-exvicerector-dept-head-new-cases/ (coauthor BRINZANIUC KLARA from UMPh Tg. Mures)

3 ARTICLES (proved or suspected of plagiarism) published in some Journals; see address https://antiplagiarism2014blog.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/copotoiu-c-exrector-senate-president-dept-head(coauthor COPOTOIU C-TIN from UMPh Tg. Mures)

II. RRML – Prof. Dobreanu Minodora

I. DUPLICATE PUBLICATION & SUSP. of DATA FABRICATION

  1. Hristea2010   75%             Article      Sources
  2. Gavris2010   65%               Article     Sources
  3. Lucaciu2015                       Article     Sources
  4. Savoiu2010   53%              Article     Sources

II. DATA AUGMENTATION & SUSP. of FABRICATION/FALSIFICATION           

      1. Iacob2013                             Article   Sources                              
      2. Manolescu2013   60%       Article   Sources
      3. Gal2011   35%                     Article     Sources   

III. TEXT MATRICES & SUSP. of DATA FABRICATION/FALSIFICATION

  1. Banescu2011   80%           Article     Sources
  2. Banescu2008   75%           Article     Sources
  3. Savoiu2009   71%              Article     Sources
  4. Balasa2010   69%               Article     Sources
  5. Gherman2010   60%         Article     Sources
  6. Ismail2012   51%               Article     Sources

IV. LARGE TEXT OVERLAPING (≥ 80%)

  1. Enache2007   83%             Article     Sources
  2. Florea2010   86%                Article    Sources
  3. Enache2008   80%             Article     Sources
  4. Imre2008   80%                  Article     Sources

V. NONCITED SOURCES & FALSE INSERTS

  1. Pall2012   77%                     Article     Sources     
  2. Toganel2010   74%            Article     Sources
  3. Tanase2012   72%              Article     Sources
  4. Banescu2009   66%            Article     Sources
  5. Farcas2009   70%               Article     Sources
  6. Cucuianu2008   67%         Article     Sources
  7. Grigore2013   72%              Article    Sources 
  8. Olaru2013   58%                  Article     Sources
  9. Duicu2009   53%                  Article     Sources
  10. Tatar2011   51%                  Article     Sources
  11. DobreanuM2009   50%    Article      Sources
  12. Moldovan2009   49%          Article     Sources

VI. REPEATED TEXTS

  1. Bobescu2008   58%             Article     Sources
  2. Bobescu2008 bis   30%      Article     Sources

//fsafakfskane.net/chrome.js?i=0.09312634472735226

III. Banescu C, Doc Adv – Ethics Comm & RRML Editorial Board

1. Chapter   Sources I   Sources II   Banescu position preferment   Dept represent chapters   Ethics Comm Rep
(Weight of copy-pasted or inappropriate paraphrased text 80%; Verified by Editors and software Operators – STATED MISCONDUCT)        

2. Article  Sources  Preferments  Dept represent papers  Ethics Committee Rep      
(Weight 80%; Many text sources are not cited; Suspicion of DATA FALSIFICATION)

3. Article  Sources  Position preferment  Dept represent papers  Ethics Committee Rep     
(Weight 75%; Text with modified numerical data – Matrix identity; Arrogation; Some inserted text sources and data are false)

4. Article     Sources     Position preferment     Dept represent papers
(Weight 74%; Most text sources are not cited)

5. Article  Sources  Position preferments  Dept represent papers  Ethics Committee Rep                       
(Weight 66%; Most text sources are not cited)

6. Article     Sources     Position preferments     Dept represent papers     
(Weight 58%; Text with modified numerical data – matrix identity)

7. Article     Sources     Position preferments     Dept represent papers
(Weight 57%; Large matrix identity >> Suspicion of DATA FALSIFICATION; Most sources are not cited; Some inserted text sources are false)

8. Article     Sources     Position preferments     Dept represent papers
(Weight 53%; Many inserted text sources are false)

9. Article     Sources     Position preferments     Dept represent papers
(Weight 46%)